The Speeding File
Proof Positive That you Must
Contest Your Speeding Ticket.
Published Today 13 September 2006
today on British National Radio and TV (ITV & BBC) on 07.00 hrs
every subsequent newscast throughout the day.
of the Britainís Top police officers announced today that traffic
to receive further training in the laws, and use of equipment, used
motorists accused of speeding. He
stated over 300 (in England
drivers are successfully prosecuted every day for speeding, He
further stated that out
of the 300 about one disputes their guilt and pleads not guilty.
He went on to accuse this minority of using loopholes in the law to
escape prosecution, and stated that the
police intended to retrain their
police officers in an attempt to close these
This means only 0.33 % of accused
motorists ever contest their speeding ticket.
Out of this 0.33%, Over
85% who do, win their case and are found - NOT GUILTY - by
maintained all along that the police prosecution cases are poorly put
together and based on undocumented facts, poor training and the use of
approved methods and equipment, which often gives incorrect readings
to innocent drivers being
prosecuted. The Speeding File will show documented evidence
that this is true.
the police stop you and accuse you of speeding, the police intimidation
and it is so successful that most drivers do not want any contact with
police ever again. They plead guilty
rather than go into dispute with them.
Now for the first time the police are admitting that they
knowingly present cases
to the courts that cannot stand up to examination.
their charges never being contested in court, they do not care whether
your guilty or
not. It is a nice easy prosecution and
when added to the rest of their CRIMINAL STATISTICS makes their overall
success rates look good.
Is there any other crime in
that the police have a 99.76% success rate.
Theft, Murder, Armed Robbery, Assault, Muggings, Drug Suppliers,
Credit Card Fraud, Arson, Car Jacking, Kidnapping, Child Molestation.
No, their success rates are
usually well below 20%, some even in single digits.
The Speeding File highlights many such loopholes in
police training and methods, along with very serious loopholes in the
calibration and maintenance of their speed measuring equipment. Loopholes that you can and should use,
because many of these so called loopholes can and do cause serious
occur when incorrectly calibrated equipment is used in an incorrect
obtain, a so called exact measurements of speed.
The police are so used to being told lies, that to them everybody is a liar. So we come back to the measuring equipment, its accuracy, and its method of use. Only when all speed measuring equipment is calibrated correctly and used correctly by trained operators, and these requirements and operations are properly documented, will the public have complete confidence in its every day performance. Until that day you should always contest, but contest from aposition of strength - Buy - THE SPEEDING - FILE -.
Unfortunately, that still looks to be a long way off.
Buy and Try - Without Any Risk To You - Unsatisfied - Receive a Full Refund.
Here - and
Browse our Current Customer Feedback File
More Speeding Charges
Drivers might be automatically stopped from speeding by
an electronic device that could be fitted to all cars within 10 years.
The Deputy Prime Minister will be told that extensive
trials have been such a success that a phased introduction of speed
restricters would also dramatically reduce road congestion and cut
The system uses satellite navigation to pinpoint the
location of each vehicle, an in-car computer loaded with a road map and
the speed limits for each street in the country and a device to cut off
the fuel supply if the speed limits are exceeded.
Any attempt to introduce such a sophisticated device for
controlling speed automatically would see the biggest row over state
interference in road freedom since seatbelt legislation. It is also
likely to be resisted by motor manufacturers who rely heavily on images
of fast cars to sell new models.
However, researchers predict that the equipment, which
would cost only a few hundred pounds per car, will come to be widely
accepted as a life-saver, just as seat-belts were despite initial
The trials were commissioned by the Department for
Environment, Transport and the Regions and were carried out by a team
together with the Motor Industry Research Association.
Their final report is expected to recommend a 10-year
phasing-in period with the system initially voluntary for older models,
compulsory for all new cars by 2005 and mandatory by the end of the
decade. The report will claim that the benefits will become evident
once 60 per cent of vehicles have been fitted with the device, which
will slow the overall speed of traffic.
The system offers the possibility of slowing down traffic
not just to observe speed limits but to cope with particular
circumstances such as outside schools, during traffic jams, following
accidents or in dangerous weather conditions like fog.
Dr Oliver Carsten, head of the Leeds
team, predicted the system would soon be standard across the EU. "The
idea that people should have freedom to flout the law is an odd concept
when it is a legal requirement that you comply with the speed limit.
When you drive the car you hardly notice the speed limiter unless you
are deliberately trying to push things too fast."
The Department of Transport said: "There are considerable
benefits that could be had in accident reduction and fuel savings, but
it might also mean that people find other ways of speeding."